Re-Envisioning a Computer Science Curriculum

03 Apr 2021

WMSCI 2021 2021 is an international forum for scientists and engineers, researchers and consultants, theoreticians and practitioners. The purpose of the conference is to promote discussions and interactions between researchers and practitioners focused on disciplinary, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary issues, ideas, concepts, theories, methodologies and applications. The conference is particularly interested in fostering the exchange of concepts, prototypes, research ideas, and other results which could contribute to the academic arena and also benefit business, and the industrial community.

Sal Petrilli and I submitted a paper titled Re-Envisioning a Computer Science Curriculum, which is based on our experiences redesigning a CS curriculum.

After a multi-stage peer review, we are happy to learn that the paper will be published in the conference proceedings. Once it is finalized and accessible, I’ll post a public link here.

Enhancing Electronic Voting With A Dual-Blockchain Architecture

19 Mar 2021

The article that Jai Punjwani and I authored for Ledger Journal is now live. It is accessible as an open access publication at the journal website.

Enhancing Electronic Voting With A Dual-Blockchain Architecture

10 Mar 2021

Ledger Journal was launched in 2015 to address the growing need for a traditional academic journal dedicated to cryptocurrency research.

I am pleased to write that the journal accepted a paper that Jai Punjwani and I co-authored as a result of his Honor’s Thesis research. The title of the paper is Enhancing Electronic Voting With A Dual-Blockchain Architecture, which fairly accurately describes its content.

The article will be included in an upcoming issue of the journal. Once it is published, I’ll announce it here.

Interdisciplinary STEM Undergraduate Programs and the Effectiveness of Computing Competencies within the Curriculum

21 Feb 2021

IEEE ISEC’21 is a conference where academic discuss cutting-edge research and experiences with integrated approaches to the study of science, math, and technology through experiences and activities based in engineering and other design disciplines.

Katherine Herbert, Thomas J. Marlowe, Robert M. Siegfried, Jeanette Wilmanski and I collaborated on drafting a work-in-progress paper in which we explore the effectiveness of establishing computing competencies in interdisciplinary STEM education.

The paper will be published in the conference proceedings and will be presented at the 2021 Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC). Once it is finalized and accessible, I’ll post a public link here.

Don't let your Inbox run your life

14 Dec 2020

Several times per year, I start feeling very overwhelmed by all the work that must be done. At the same time, I start feeling sad about the work that could get done, but isn’t.

I recently came to the conclusion that one of the reasons for that was that I let my professional life be dictated by my email Inbox. This came as somewhat of a surprise, since I have spent quite a lot of effort to automatically filter much of the stuff that isn’t time-sentitive into folders. Years ago, I have also turned off all email notifications, thinking that it would help not getting overwhelmed.

Obviously, that wasn’t enough.

So, on top of all of that, I have adopted a new approach that seems to be working well for me. It is based on the simple premise that Email is not a To Do manager.

Sure; many To Do items will come in via email. Explicitly recognizing them as To Do-items, and taking the effort to manage them separately from email is indeed a bit more work in the short term. However, that short-term effort pays back in long-term piece of mind.

The Inbox-0 movement is not new, and I did not invent it. I have tried many times to adopt it, since I have always like the idea. This is the first time that I feel that I might have found a method that is based on its ideas, but omits some of its shortcomings.

For the last month, I have used the following principles:

1. Reading email and properly responding to it is a task in its own right. Do not confuse it for overhead, and make sure to only open your Inbox when you can spend time on processing it properly.

2. Be generous with delete. Much of the email we get is unnecessary and does not warrant your (scarce/valuable) intellectual cyles.

3. Email is not a To Do-manager. A To Do-manager is a To Do-manager.

4. If you choose not to delete an email, your options are:

   1. Respond immediately

   2. Archive (away from Inbox) for later reference

   3. Create a To Do-list item to address it

5. Do not stop this cycle until your Inbox is empty.

In tandem with this switch, I also turned off Google’s conversation view. I wish I could go back to “old school” email threading, but I understand that the Gmail approach is different and doesn’t allow for that. However, turning the feature off allows me to consider each email that makes it to my Inbox separately.

I chose to use the Things To Do-manager. It has a number of features I was looking for, even though it is not the cheapest one out there. Specifically, I looked for:

• Product must be actively maintained and supported

• Non-distracting UI

• Ability to assign deadlines, but not require them

• Ability to add notes

• Ability to add tag items

• Cloud sync across devices

• Ability to define recurring To Do-items

• Ability to turn reminders off

• Not “just” a web app

Things provided all of these. I wish there were a Windows and/or a Web App of the manager as well, but since my primary productivity infrastructure consists of a Macbook and an iPhone, this wasn’t a deal breaker.